Adversarial machine learning with Lux.jl

The purpose of this tutorial is to explain how to embed a neural network model from Lux.jl into JuMP.

Required packages

This tutorial requires the following packages

using JuMP
import Lux
import Ipopt
import MathOptAI
import MLDatasets
import MLUtils
import OneHotArrays
import Optimisers
import Plots
import Random
import Zygote

Data

This tutorial uses images from the MNIST dataset.

We load the predefined train and test splits:

train_data = MLDatasets.MNIST(; split = :train)
dataset MNIST:
  metadata  =>    Dict{String, Any} with 3 entries
  split     =>    :train
  features  =>    28×28×60000 Array{Float32, 3}
  targets   =>    60000-element Vector{Int64}
test_data = MLDatasets.MNIST(; split = :test)
dataset MNIST:
  metadata  =>    Dict{String, Any} with 3 entries
  split     =>    :test
  features  =>    28×28×10000 Array{Float32, 3}
  targets   =>    10000-element Vector{Int64}

Since the data are images, it is helpful to plot them. (This requires a transpose and reversing the rows to get the orientation correct.)

function plot_image(x::Matrix; kwargs...)
    return Plots.heatmap(
        x'[size(x, 1):-1:1, :];
        xlims = (1, size(x, 2)),
        ylims = (1, size(x, 1)),
        aspect_ratio = true,
        legend = false,
        xaxis = false,
        yaxis = false,
        kwargs...,
    )
end

function plot_image(instance::NamedTuple)
    return plot_image(instance.features; title = "Label = $(instance.targets)")
end

Plots.plot([plot_image(train_data[i]) for i in 1:6]...; layout = (2, 3))
Example block output

Training

We use a simple neural network with one hidden layer and a sigmoid activation function. (There are better performing networks; try experimenting.)

chain = Lux.Chain(
    Lux.Dense(28^2 => 32, Lux.sigmoid),
    Lux.Dense(32 => 10),
    Lux.softmax,
)
rng = Random.MersenneTwister();
parameters, state = Lux.setup(rng, chain)
predictor = (chain, parameters, state);

Here is a function to load our data into the format that predictor expects:

function data_loader(data; batchsize, shuffle = false)
    x = reshape(data.features, 28^2, :)
    y = OneHotArrays.onehotbatch(data.targets, 0:9)
    return MLUtils.DataLoader((x, y); batchsize, shuffle)
end
data_loader (generic function with 1 method)

and here is a function to score the percentage of correct labels, where we assign a label by choosing the label of the highest softmax in the final layer.

function score_model(predictor, data)
    chain, parameters, state = predictor
    x, y = only(data_loader(data; batchsize = length(data)))
    y_hat, _ = chain(x, parameters, state)
    is_correct = OneHotArrays.onecold(y) .== OneHotArrays.onecold(y_hat)
    p = round(100 * sum(is_correct) / length(is_correct); digits = 2)
    println("Accuracy = $p %")
    return
end
score_model (generic function with 1 method)

The accuracy of our model is only around 10% before training:

score_model(predictor, train_data)
score_model(predictor, test_data)
Accuracy = 9.04 %
Accuracy = 8.91 %

Let's improve that by training our model.

Note

It is not the purpose of this tutorial to explain how Lux works; see the documentation at https://lux.csail.mit.edu for more details. Changing the number of epochs or the learning rate can improve the loss.

begin
    train_loader = data_loader(train_data; batchsize = 256, shuffle = true)
    optimizer_state = Optimisers.setup(Optimisers.Adam(0.0003f0), parameters)
    for epoch in 1:30
        loss = 0.0
        for (x, y) in train_loader
            global state
            (loss_batch, state), pullback = Zygote.pullback(parameters) do p
                y_model, new_state = chain(x, p, state)
                return Lux.CrossEntropyLoss()(y_model, y), new_state
            end
            gradients = only(pullback((one(loss), nothing)))
            Optimisers.update!(optimizer_state, parameters, gradients)
            loss += loss_batch
        end
        loss = round(loss / length(train_loader); digits = 4)
        print("Epoch $epoch: loss = $loss\t")
        score_model(predictor, test_data)
    end
end
Epoch 1: loss = 1.8706	Accuracy = 77.97 %
Epoch 2: loss = 1.2493	Accuracy = 84.27 %
Epoch 3: loss = 0.9032	Accuracy = 87.36 %
Epoch 4: loss = 0.7013	Accuracy = 88.77 %
Epoch 5: loss = 0.5774	Accuracy = 89.62 %
Epoch 6: loss = 0.4965	Accuracy = 90.3 %
Epoch 7: loss = 0.441	Accuracy = 90.73 %
Epoch 8: loss = 0.4006	Accuracy = 91.07 %
Epoch 9: loss = 0.3701	Accuracy = 91.39 %
Epoch 10: loss = 0.3463	Accuracy = 91.67 %
Epoch 11: loss = 0.3268	Accuracy = 91.95 %
Epoch 12: loss = 0.3102	Accuracy = 92.24 %
Epoch 13: loss = 0.2964	Accuracy = 92.46 %
Epoch 14: loss = 0.2845	Accuracy = 92.53 %
Epoch 15: loss = 0.2737	Accuracy = 92.66 %
Epoch 16: loss = 0.2642	Accuracy = 92.93 %
Epoch 17: loss = 0.256	Accuracy = 93.03 %
Epoch 18: loss = 0.2481	Accuracy = 93.19 %
Epoch 19: loss = 0.2411	Accuracy = 93.3 %
Epoch 20: loss = 0.2349	Accuracy = 93.43 %
Epoch 21: loss = 0.2288	Accuracy = 93.52 %
Epoch 22: loss = 0.2238	Accuracy = 93.69 %
Epoch 23: loss = 0.2185	Accuracy = 93.77 %
Epoch 24: loss = 0.2137	Accuracy = 93.76 %
Epoch 25: loss = 0.2092	Accuracy = 93.91 %
Epoch 26: loss = 0.2048	Accuracy = 94.04 %
Epoch 27: loss = 0.2008	Accuracy = 94.09 %
Epoch 28: loss = 0.1971	Accuracy = 94.12 %
Epoch 29: loss = 0.1937	Accuracy = 94.26 %
Epoch 30: loss = 0.1903	Accuracy = 94.32 %

Here are the first eight predictions of the test data:

function plot_image(predictor, x::Matrix)
    y, _ = chain(vec(x), parameters, state)
    score, index = findmax(y)
    title = "Predicted: $(index - 1) ($(round(Int, 100 * score))%)"
    return plot_image(x; title)
end

plots = [plot_image(predictor, test_data[i].features) for i in 1:8]
Plots.plot(plots...; size = (1200, 600), layout = (2, 4))
Example block output

We can also look at the best and worst four predictions:

x, y = only(data_loader(test_data; batchsize = length(test_data)))
y_model, _ = chain(x, parameters, state)
losses = Lux.CrossEntropyLoss(; agg = identity)(y_model, y)
indices = sortperm(losses; dims = 2)[[1:4; end-3:end]]
plots = [plot_image(predictor, test_data[i].features) for i in indices]
Plots.plot(plots...; size = (1200, 600), layout = (2, 4))
Example block output

There are still some fairly bad mistakes. Can you change the model or training parameters improve to improve things?

JuMP

Now that we have a trained machine learning model, we can embed it in a JuMP model.

Here's a function which takes a test case and returns an example that maximizes the probability of the adversarial example.

function find_adversarial_image(test_case; adversary_label, δ = 0.05)
    model = Model(Ipopt.Optimizer)
    set_silent(model)
    @variable(model, 0 <= x[1:28, 1:28] <= 1)
    @constraint(model, -δ .<= x .- test_case.features .<= δ)
    # Note: we need to use `vec` here because `x` is a 28-by-28 Matrix, but our
    # neural network expects a 28^2 length vector.
    y, _ = MathOptAI.add_predictor(model, predictor, vec(x))
    @objective(model, Max, y[adversary_label+1] - y[test_case.targets+1])
    optimize!(model)
    @assert is_solved_and_feasible(model)
    return value.(x)
end
find_adversarial_image (generic function with 1 method)

Let's try finding an adversarial example to the third test image. The image on the left is our input image. The network thinks this is a 1 with probability 99%. The image on the right is the adversarial image. The network thinks this is a 7, although it is less confident.

x_adversary = find_adversarial_image(test_data[3]; adversary_label = 7);
Plots.plot(
    plot_image(predictor, test_data[3].features),
    plot_image(predictor, Float32.(x_adversary)),
)
Example block output

This page was generated using Literate.jl.